When the Case Depends on What a Human Could or Could Not Do
In many legal cases, the outcome hinges on a fundamental question:
Was it physically possible?
SANTOS provides scientifically grounded, physics-based analysis to answer that question with quantitative evidence, not opinion.
Developed over more than two decades and validated through extensive research, SANTOS evaluates human motion, force, and physical capability under real-world conditions.
🔬 What SANTOS Does
SANTOS analyzes:
- Human motion and posture
- Joint forces and torques
- Spinal loading and injury risk
- Balance, stability, and recovery
- Feasibility of actions under physical constraints
All results are based on:
- Biomechanics
- Newtonian physics
- Physiological limits of the human body
🧠 Types of Injuries and Cases We Analyze
SANTOS is particularly powerful in cases involving physical capability, force, and motion.
🏋️ Workplace Injury
Common questions:
- Was a lifting task within normal human capability?
- Did the task exceed safe spinal loading limits?
- Could repetitive work cause cumulative injury?
Typical injuries:
- Lumbar disc herniation
- Lower back strain
- Shoulder injuries from lifting or overhead work
- Repetitive strain injuries
⚙️ Product Liability & Ergonomics
Common questions:
- Was the product design compatible with normal human use?
- Did the design require excessive force or torque?
- Could a safer alternative design reduce injury risk?
Typical injuries:
- Wrist ligament tears (tool torque / kickback)
- Shoulder injuries from high-force operation
- Back injuries from poor ergonomic design
- Fatigue-related injuries from repetitive use
🚶 Slip, Trip & Fall
Common questions:
- Could the person have recovered from a slip?
- Was the friction sufficient to prevent a fall?
- Was balance recovery physically possible?
Typical injuries:
- Hip fractures
- Head injury
- Spinal injury
- Knee and ankle injuries
🚗 Automotive & Impact Injuries
Common questions:
- Did seat or restraint design contribute to injury?
- Were neck forces within human tolerance?
- Could the occupant have avoided the motion?
Typical injuries:
- Whiplash (cervical spine injury)
- Shoulder and torso injury
- Impact-related spinal loading
🏗️ Industrial & Equipment Accidents
Common questions:
- Did equipment require forces beyond human capability?
- Was control of the device physically possible?
- Did torque or load exceed joint limits?
Typical injuries:
- Joint overload injuries
- Crush or force-related trauma
- Loss of control injuries
📊 What We Deliver
SANTOS provides objective, measurable outputs that support expert testimony:
- Joint torques (Nm)
- Forces (N)
- Spinal compression and shear
- Motion trajectories
- Stability and balance analysis
- Comparative scenarios (safe vs. unsafe design)
⚖️ Court-Ready Evidence
Our analysis can support:
- Expert reports
- Deposition preparation
- Trial testimony
- Visual demonstrations for juries
🔍 Why SANTOS is Different
✔ Physics-Based (Not Guesswork)
All results are derived from first principles of mechanics and biomechanics
✔ Validated and Peer-Reviewed
Supported by extensive scientific literature and validation studies
✔ Quantifiable Results
Provides numbers, thresholds, and limits, not subjective opinions
✔ Reproducible and Transparent
Inputs, assumptions, and outputs are fully documented
⚖️ What SANTOS Does NOT Do
To ensure clarity and scientific integrity:
- SANTOS does not determine fault or negligence
- SANTOS does not model intent or decision-making
- SANTOS does not replace expert judgment
SANTOS provides scientific analysis — experts provide interpretation
📈 From Question to Scientific Answer
Legal Question:
“Could this person have performed this action?”
SANTOS Answer:
“The required torque was 95 Nm, exceeding human capability of 40 Nm — the action was physically infeasible.”
📞 Discuss Your Case
If your case involves:
- Human motion
- Physical capability
- Forces and injury mechanisms
We can provide a scientific evaluation to support your legal strategy.
👉 Request a Case Review
👉 Speak with Our Team